|
Skav
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: June 28, 2012, 02:58:51 PM » |
|
Just seen Eddie said on twitter he was working on something big for 22nd September. Sounds a bit ominous but a chance it could be a Frampton fight I guess.
If it is Froch though I'm pretty sure FW would move Burns v Mitchell. As good a fight it is, BN just doesn't have enough muscle to promote it to get anywhere near the viewing figures Froch v Kessler would on the same night.
. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
LiveFight
|
|
« Reply #45 on: June 28, 2012, 02:58:51 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Alba
|
|
« Reply #46 on: June 28, 2012, 04:53:19 PM » |
|
FW is too stubborn to move Burns vs Mitchell but i hope he does then i may have a chance of going  i dunno , wouldn't surprise me as its all down to ego's if the tried to do it on the same day... also if its Frampton it will be in Belfast, which is ashame as its quite close to Glasgow |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
the gaffer
|
|
« Reply #47 on: June 28, 2012, 06:37:28 PM » |
|
Mitchell's naturel power will be to much for burns...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
gaz
|
|
|
|
jorg21
|
|
« Reply #48 on: June 29, 2012, 04:24:00 AM » |
|
Mitchell's naturel power will be to much for burns...
Nonsense Katsidis hits harder than Kevin and Burns took a few solid and stood up to them. Mitchell 34 fights 33 wins 24 by ko. Katsidis 34 fights 28 wins 23 by ko. I'd say michael hits harder going by those stats. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 29, 2012, 04:27:51 AM by jorg21 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Aaron
|
|
« Reply #49 on: June 29, 2012, 07:06:19 AM » |
|
Nonsense Katsidis hits harder than Kevin and Burns took a few solid and stood up to them.
Mitchell 34 fights 33 wins 24 by ko.
Katsidis 34 fights 28 wins 23 by ko.
I'd say michael hits harder going by those stats.
For me there was little snap in the punches of katsidis when he fought burns, Mick at the best of times has been a grind you down kind of guy from what I have seen. I would say neither him or kev are great punchers to be honest. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The Hurricane
|
|
« Reply #50 on: June 29, 2012, 08:56:58 AM » |
|
Nonsense Katsidis hits harder than Kevin and Burns took a few solid and stood up to them.
Mitchell 34 fights 33 wins 24 by ko.
Katsidis 34 fights 28 wins 23 by ko.
I'd say michael hits harder going by those stats.
It's a bit unorthodox to try and use the fact that Katsidis has a lower KO percentage than Mitchell to argue that he hits harder than him! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The Hurricane
|
|
« Reply #51 on: June 29, 2012, 09:24:27 AM » |
|
i dunno , wouldn't surprise me as its all down to ego's if the tried to do it on the same day... also if its Frampton it will be in Belfast, which is ashame as its quite close to Glasgow
Looks like there's a possibility it could be Frampton v Martinez or Molitor on the 22nd. I'm not sure FW has the cards to play at ego's at the moment. The way things look at the moment Eddie drew pocket Aces and FW ended up with 7 and 2 off suit. Burns v Mitchell is probably the best fight FW can make from his camp (I discounted a Groves v DeGale rematch as DeGale seemingly wants to split) and needs something big to kick off the new season on BN. I don't think he can afford to have another decent fight close by encroaching on the limelight from this one. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
jorg21
|
|
« Reply #52 on: June 29, 2012, 08:27:45 PM » |
|
It's a bit unorthodox to try and use the fact that Katsidis has a lower KO percentage than Mitchell to argue that he hits harder than him!
Knocked out 23 of his 28 wins is a better record than 24 kos of 33 wins |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The Hurricane
|
|
« Reply #53 on: June 29, 2012, 10:11:43 PM » |
|
Knocked out 23 of his 28 wins is a better record than 24 kos of 33 wins
That's not how logic works. The way you see it a guy with a 1 ko from 1 win against 99 losses would be a harder hitter than Mitchell. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Gadje
|
|
« Reply #54 on: June 30, 2012, 12:19:14 AM » |
|
If Mitchell fights well Burns still beats him. What suggests otherwise?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
son of bonters
|
|
« Reply #55 on: June 30, 2012, 12:56:14 AM » |
|
If Mitchell fights well Burns still beats him. What suggests otherwise?
I agree. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I don't give a tuppenny F*ck about your moral conundrum, you meat-headed shitsack. That's more or less the thing.
|
|
|
|
jorg21
|
|
« Reply #56 on: June 30, 2012, 01:06:34 AM » |
|
That's not how logic works. The way you see it a guy with a 1 ko from 1 win against 99 losses would be a harder hitter than Mitchell.
Ok then lets hear your logic on how Mitchell has a higher percentage? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The Hurricane
|
|
« Reply #57 on: June 30, 2012, 09:17:16 AM » |
|
Ok then lets hear your logic on how Mitchell has a higher percentage?
It's based on the fact that Mitchell has knocked out 70.59% of his opponents where as Katsidis has only knocked out 67.65% of his, thus giving Mitchell the higher ko percentage. It's pretty simple really. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Dexter_Morgan
|
|
« Reply #58 on: June 30, 2012, 10:37:59 AM » |
|
It's based on the fact that Mitchell has knocked out 70.59% of his opponents where as Katsidis has only knocked out 67.65% of his, thus giving Mitchell the higher ko percentage. It's pretty simple really.
I'm not a maths genius but that doesn't seem right to me |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 30, 2012, 10:57:15 AM by Dexter_Morgan »
|
Logged
|
A Slice of Life
|
|
|
deck
Global Moderator
Executive Member
 Offline
Posts: 9816
The Pittsburg Windmill
|
|
« Reply #59 on: June 30, 2012, 10:55:39 AM » |
|
You can't argue with KO percentages. However there are always different circumstances. Quality of opponents, manner of knockout, speed of knockout, opponents chin, stamina, cumulative shots etc... .
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
